Skip to main content
Health & EducationNews

Can Anyone be “Pro-family” or “Pro-life” when they vote against IVF?

By June 14, 2024No Comments

“Today, U.S. Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), and Patty Murray (D-WA) called out Senate Republicans’ hypocrisy after nearly every single Republican blocked the Senate Democrats’ Right to IVF Actdespite publicly claiming to support IVF for the millions of Americans who rely on it to build their family. …”

All but two Republicans voted no to IVF and with that no vote, told American families that if they need help to build their families, they are out of luck.

Pro-Life?  HA! HA!

They can’t be “Pro-Life” or “Pro-Family” when they say no to women’s health and women’s pregnancies.

It is ten days until the second anniversary of when the Supreme Court eliminated “Roe v Wade” and, with it, threw out the Rule of Law.  Now Senators Booker, Duckworth, and Murray are fighting back, but another battle was lost today.  Meanwhile, here is a sample of upcoming important bills intended to help families.

On Wednesday, I was stunned to read that the Southern Baptist Convention has voted to oppose vitro fertilization (IVF), saying it was “dehumanizing.”  61% of the convention also voted to oppose women becoming pastors.

Michelle Boorstein, The Washington PostSouthern Baptist Convention votes to oppose in vitro fertilization

ProPublica is doing an incredible job of researching what happens to women and their hopes for families in states where, because of the fall of Roe v. Wade, they are refused health care services.  The following is one of the Post-Roe news stories ProPublica has shared.

Stacy Kranitz, special to ProPublica, and Kavitha Surana, ProPublica:  Mayron’s Story, Post-Roe America

In this case, It is one year after Mayron was denied an abortion.

“Tennessee prohibits women from having abortions in nearly all circumstances.  But once the babies are here, the state provides little help.”